Technical Philosophy

Our Approach to Building AI

Name: Autonomy Receptionist™
Availability: InStock

Most companies build AI assistants that wait for prompts. We build autonomous agents that monitor the world and act when conditions are right. Here's how we do it.

Core thesis: The next generation of AI won't be better chatbots. It'll be systems that operate autonomously—answering phones, monitoring prices, managing schedules—without human prompting. This requires fundamentally different architecture.

Core Principles

Proactive, Not Reactive

Traditional AI waits for prompts. We build systems that monitor, predict, and act autonomously.

→ Event-driven architecture with continuous monitoring loops rather than request-response patterns.

Simple Models, Complex Orchestration

The LLM is 20% of the system. The real complexity is in reliability, latency, and decision logic.

→ Streaming pipelines, fallback chains, and state machines that handle edge cases gracefully.

Latency as a Feature

Sub-2s response times aren't optional. Speed determines whether users trust autonomous systems.

→ Parallel processing, warm connections, predictive caching, and aggressive optimization.

Designed for Zero-to-Production

Serverless-first architecture that scales from 10 to 10,000 users without infrastructure changes.

→ Vercel Functions + edge compute, connection pooling, and usage-based pricing that scales linearly.

Fail Gracefully, Always

AI fails. APIs timeout. Networks drop. Our systems degrade gracefully instead of crashing.

→ Circuit breakers, fallback responses, retry logic with exponential backoff, and monitoring at every layer.

Ship Fast, Learn Faster

Production teaches more than unit tests. We optimize for iteration speed over premature optimization.

→ Feature flags, canary deployments, real-time monitoring, and weekly release cycles.

Architecture Patterns

These patterns recur across all our products. They're the building blocks of autonomous AI systems.

Event-Driven Monitoring

Problem

How do you know when to take action without constantly asking?

Solution

Continuous background jobs (cron) that poll external state and trigger actions when conditions are met.

Real Example

Autonomy PricePulse™ checks prices every 4 hours. When a drop >10% is detected, it immediately alerts the user via voice call.

// Vercel cron runs every 4 hours
export async function GET(req: Request) {
  const products = await getActiveProducts();

  for (const product of products) {
    const currentPrice = await fetchPrice(product.asin);

    if (shouldAlert(product, currentPrice)) {
      await callUser(product.userId, {
        product: product.name,
        newPrice: currentPrice,
        savings: product.lastPrice - currentPrice,
      });
    }
  }

  return Response.json({ checked: products.length });
}

Streaming Pipelines

Problem

Voice AI needs <2s latency. Sequential processing takes 5-10s.

Solution

Stream every layer: transcription → LLM → synthesis. Start speaking before the LLM finishes thinking.

Real Example

Autonomy Receptionist™ streams Deepgram transcription directly to GPT-4, which streams to voice synthesis. Total latency: 1.8s.

// Stream LLM response to voice synthesis
const response = await openai.chat.completions.create({
  model: "gpt-4",
  stream: true,
  messages: conversationHistory,
});

for await (const chunk of response) {
  const text = chunk.choices[0]?.delta?.content;
  if (text) {
    // Synthesize and play immediately
    await synthesizeAndStream(text);
  }
}

Confidence-Based Decision Making

Problem

How do you prevent false positives from over-alerting users?

Solution

Every autonomous action requires a confidence score. Low confidence → delay or ask for confirmation.

Real Example

Before calling a user about a price drop, we calculate confidence based on historical patterns and user preferences.

interface Decision {
  shouldAct: boolean;
  confidence: number; // 0-100
  reasoning: string;
}

function makeDecision(context: Context): Decision {
  const signals = analyzeSignals(context);
  const confidence = calculateConfidence(signals);

  // Only act if confidence > 80%
  return {
    shouldAct: confidence > 80,
    confidence,
    reasoning: explainDecision(signals),
  };
}

State Persistence & Memory

Problem

Proactive AI needs context across sessions. What did we already tell the user?

Solution

Every interaction persists to database. Decision engines check history before acting.

Real Example

Autonomy Receptionist™ remembers previous calls from the same number. Won't repeat information or re-ask questions.

// Check if we already alerted about this
const recentAlert = await db.alert.findFirst({
  where: {
    userId: user.id,
    productId: product.id,
    createdAt: { gte: subHours(new Date(), 24) },
  },
});

// Don't spam - wait 24h between similar alerts
if (recentAlert) {
  return { shouldAlert: false, reason: "Recently alerted" };
}

Key Technical Decisions

Every choice is a trade-off. Here's what we chose and why.

Serverless over containers

AI workloads are spiky. Serverless scales to zero during off-hours and handles 100x spikes instantly. No DevOps overhead.

PostgreSQL over NoSQL

Relational data (users, calls, products) with strong consistency requirements. Prisma provides type-safe queries.

Monorepo over microservices

Small team, shared types/utilities. Microservices add coordination overhead we don't need at this scale.

Twilio over custom WebRTC

Telephony is complex. Twilio handles PSTN connectivity, compliance, and reliability. We focus on AI logic.

OpenAI API over self-hosted models

Inference cost ($0.03/min) is negligible vs engineering time. Self-hosting adds operational complexity without ROI.

Monitoring > Testing

Unit tests catch syntax errors. Production monitoring catches real user problems. We invest heavily in Datadog + Sentry.

Automation vs. Assistance

AI Assistants (Not Us)

✗Wait for user to ask
✗Require constant prompting
✗Can't monitor external events
✗No memory across sessions
✗User bears cognitive load

Autonomous AI (Our Approach)

✓Monitor continuously, act proactively
✓Make decisions based on context
✓Trigger on external events (calls, price drops)
✓Persistent state and conversation memory
✓Zero cognitive load for users

Example: A chatbot waits for you to ask "Did the price drop?" An autonomous agent monitors 24/7 and calls you the moment it drops below your threshold.

The second approach requires fundamentally different infrastructure: background jobs, state management, decision engines, and multi-channel alerting (voice, SMS, email). That's what we build.

The Future: Full Autonomy

Today, our systems alert you when action is needed. Tomorrow, they'll execute autonomously within your preferences. Imagine AI that automatically books appointments, purchases products within budget, and declines meetings—no confirmation required.

That's where we're headed. Proactive first, autonomous next.

Want to see this approach in action?

Explore Our Products Read Technical Blog